<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So They All Moved Over and One Fell Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.zizee.com/2010/02/17/so-they-all-moved-over-and-one-fell-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.zizee.com/2010/02/17/so-they-all-moved-over-and-one-fell-out/</link>
	<description>Growing an internet startup in a gazillion easy steps</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 01:13:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy McGrath</title>
		<link>http://blog.zizee.com/2010/02/17/so-they-all-moved-over-and-one-fell-out/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy McGrath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 06:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.zizee.com/?p=283#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great question Cromwell!

The simplest way to test if the multi-site structure is working would be to have an &quot;About zizee&quot; link on Zimmersion.com that can either take the use to zizee.com, or zimmersion.com/about_zizee. At the same time you would manipulate the &quot;signup&quot; link to have an identifier, much like wordpresses&#039;s link that you told us about in your comment to my previous post about A/B testing. By counting the number of conversions using each of the links you can then work out which is more successful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great question Cromwell!</p>
<p>The simplest way to test if the multi-site structure is working would be to have an &#8220;About zizee&#8221; link on Zimmersion.com that can either take the use to zizee.com, or zimmersion.com/about_zizee. At the same time you would manipulate the &#8220;signup&#8221; link to have an identifier, much like wordpresses&#8217;s link that you told us about in your comment to my previous post about A/B testing. By counting the number of conversions using each of the links you can then work out which is more successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cromwell</title>
		<link>http://blog.zizee.com/2010/02/17/so-they-all-moved-over-and-one-fell-out/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Cromwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.zizee.com/?p=283#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Jimmy, how would you use A/B testing to test your theory? All I can think of are impractical solutions.

Cromwell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimmy, how would you use A/B testing to test your theory? All I can think of are impractical solutions.</p>
<p>Cromwell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

